How did the rise of the Knights of Labor impact the Populist movement in the late 1800s

From Ohio History Central

The People's Party, also known as the Populist Party, was an important political party in the United States of America during the late nineteenth century.

The People's Party originated in the early 1890s. It was organized in Kansas, but the party quickly spread across the United States. It drew its members from Farmers' Alliances, the Grange, and the Knights of Labor. Originally, the Populists did not form a national organization, preferring to gain political influence within individual states.

The Populist Party consisted primarily of farmers unhappy with the Democratic and Republican Parties. The Populists believed that the federal government needed to play a more active role in the American economy by regulating various businesses, especially the railroads. In particular, the Populists supported women's suffrage the direct election of United States Senators. They hoped that the enactment women's suffrage and the direct election of senators would enable them to elect some of their members to political office. Populists also supported a graduated income tax, government ownership of the railroads, improved working conditions in factories, immigration restrictions, an eight-hour workday, the recognition of unions, and easier access to credit. 

During the early 1890s, the Populist Party garnered numerous victories. The party won governors' seats in Colorado, Washington, North Carolina, Montana, and several additional states. The Populists gained control of state legislatures in Kansas, Nebraska, and North Carolina, and they succeeded in electing members to the United States House of Representatives in Kansas, Nebraska, Minnesota, and California.

In 1892, the People's Party formed a national organization. The party selected James Weaver as its candidate for the presidency of the United States. The Populist platform called for government ownership of the railroads and the telephone and telegraph networks. It also demanded the free coinage of silver, an end to private script, a graduated income tax, direct election of senators, additional government and railroad-owned land being made available to homesteaders, and the implementation of secret ballots. The Populists won numerous political offices at the state and local levels, but Weaver finished a distant third to Grover Cleveland in the presidential election. By the election of 1896, the Democratic Party had absorbed many of the Populist ideals, causing the People's Party to cease to exist as a national organization.

In Ohio, the Populist Party remained a relatively insignificant force in politics. Thousands of Ohioans, especially farmers and industrial workers, agreed with the Populists platform, but they made up a minority of the states populace. John J. Seitz, a Populist, ran for Ohio's gubernatorial seat, but he received less than three-tenths of one percent of the votes cast in the election. The party performed significantly better in the gubernatorial race of 1895. Jacob S. Coxey ran as the Populist candidate and received fifty-two thousand votes. It was a respectable showing, but Coxey still lost the election. He ran again in 1897. This time he received just over six thousand votes, illustrating the declining popularity of the Populist Party.

The People's Party in Ohio helped Republicans tremendously, because the Populists tended to draw their supporters from the Democratic Party. To win back their former members, the Democrats in Ohio, as the party did nationally, quickly adopted many of the Populists ideals.

See Also

The Populist Movement in the 19th Century

  • Charles PostelSan Francisco State University, History

You do not currently have access to this article

Login

Please login to access the full content.

Subscribe

Access to the full content requires a subscription

How did the rise of the Knights of Labor impact the Populist movement in the late 1800s? The rise of the Knights of Labor led to the creation of granges and farmers’ alliances in the late 1800s. The rise of the Knights of Labor led to support for a national populist political party in the late 1800s. The rise of the Knights of Labor led to the widespread circulation of free silver coinage in the late 1800s. The rise of the Knights of Labor led to the 1890 election of William Jennings Bryan in the late 1800s.

The rise of the Knights of Labor led to support for a national populist political party in the late 1800s, is how the rise of the Knights of Labor impact the Populist movement in the late 1800s.

Question

Asked 12/3/2020 8:27:48 PM

Updated 10/4/2021 1:50:28 PM

1 Answer/Comment

Rating

3

The rise of the Knights of Labor led to support for a national populist political party in the late 1800s, is how the rise of the Knights of Labor impact the Populist movement in the late 1800s.

Added 10/4/2021 1:50:28 PM

This answer has been confirmed as correct and helpful.

What led to the Populist movement of the late 1800s?

Cotton prices continued to fall and dropped to 7.5¢ a pound by 1892, or about the cost of production. Efforts by farmers to bring economic and political change within the Bourbon-controlled Democratic Party seemed hopeless. This led Mississippi farmers to turn to and support the newly created Populist Party.

What happened to the Populist Party in the late 1800s?

The Populist Party emerged in the early 1890s as an important force in the Southern and Western United States, but collapsed after it nominated Democrat William Jennings Bryan in the 1896 United States presidential election.

What led to the rise of the Populist movement and what effect did it have?

What led to the rise of the Populist movement, and what effect did it have? Farmers received low prices for their crops, yet they had to pay high costs for transportation. The cost of doing business rose and farmers blamed big businesses for their problems.

Why did the Populist movement rise up in the later 1880s?

Throughout the 1880s, local political action groups known as Farmers' Alliances sprang up among Midwesterners and Southerners, who were discontented because of crop failures, falling prices, and poor marketing and credit facilities.