Objection leading là gì

If you are an attorney or a party representing yourself in a lawsuit ("pro se" or "pro per"), you will inevitably face a barrage of objections at trial. Among these, you can expect to hear at least one lack of foundation objection — but chances are you will hear multiple.

You must be prepared to address this kind of objection if you want to get your evidence admitted at trial so that it may be seen and considered by the jurors in their deliberations.

What Is a Lack of Foundation Objection?

A lack of foundation objection occurs when an attorney or self-represented party tries to enter evidence (like witness testimony or a document) at trial without demonstrating an adequate factual or legal basis for allowing it into evidence.

Every court in the United States operates under a strict set of rules that determine what evidence is — or is not — admissible at trial. Federal courts follow the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE).

State courts often mirror the FRE, though there are differences from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Always be sure to follow the rules in your jurisdiction.

Rules of evidence exist to help ensure a fair trial for all parties involved in a lawsuit. They aim to limit the evidence used at trial to facts and documents that are relevant to the case and are not speculative or unreliable.

Learn more about rules of evidence.

How to Respond to a Lack of Foundation Objection

If the opposing attorney makes an objection based on lack of foundation, it can be a simple problem to fix (so long as the evidence is admissible at trial according to the rules of evidence in your jurisdiction).

You might hear a lack of foundation objection when you are questioning a witness but have not shown the court that the witness is qualified to answer the question. Typically, this happens when it has not been shown the witness has personal knowledge or a basis to offer certain testimony. 

To recover from this objection, you must lay a proper foundation for the testimony — i.e., demonstrate that the witness has personal knowledge on the topic that qualifies her to answer the question.

You can do this by slowing down, backing up, and asking the necessary questions to lay the proper foundation. 

Example of a Lack of Foundation Objection

For example, say the witness testified that he is a retired professional tennis player. Next, you ask him how much rubber is in a tennis ball.

The opposing attorney will likely state an objection that your question lacks foundation. Why? Because your line of questioning has not demonstrated that the witness is qualified to evaluate the composition of a tennis ball.

To lay the foundation, you'd need to back up your questioning to elicit the necessary testimony showing the tennis player is qualified to discuss the rubber content in the ball.

Remember the purpose of the rules of evidence: to ensure that the jury hears facts in the case, not speculation or guesses. If the tennis player has no knowledge about the manufacturing of tennis balls, his testimony might not be reliable.

However, if further questioning reveals that the tennis player had worked as a floor supervisor at a tennis ball manufacturing company for 20 years, it would show that the witness (tennis player) was qualified to answer the question of how much rubber is in a tennis ball.

If you'd like to see the dialogue that demonstrates this exact scenario, including the objection and rephrasing, take a look at 5 Common Objections in Court You Should Master.

Other Trial Objections to Consider

It is crucial to learn how to respond to a lack of foundation objection if you want to get your evidence admitted at trial.

Not only will you need to know how to address this and other objections, but you'll also need to know when to make your own objections — especially if you don't want the opposing attorney to take advantage of your lack of courtroom experience.

To help you on your journey, we've put together Trial Objections 101: Making and Responding to Objections. In this video tutorial, we discuss 18 common courtroom objections, including hearsay, argumentative, leading questions, asked and answered, badgering the witness, misleading questions, etc.

Johnny Depp took the stand for a fourth day today (Monday, 25 April 2022) to continue being cross-examined by Amber Heard’s attorney, Benjamin Rottenborn. Some phrases that have stuck out for some people are “Objection, compound”, “Objection sustained”, and “Objection, hearsay” – what are their meanings in the context of Johnny Depp’s lawsuit against former wife Amber Heard?

What are the different types of objections lawyers can use during witness’ depositions?

There are many kinds of objections lawyers can make during a witness’ deposition. 

An objection is simply a formal protest. When an attorney says “Objection” it indicates they want the judge to disallow a particular part of the testimony. 

  • CULTURE: Bridget Brink’s age explored as Biden names her new Ukraine Ambassador
Objection leading là gì
Photo by STEVE HELBER/POOL/AFP via Getty Images

The Florida Bar’s website categorises objections in the following way: proper objections (eg, “objection, leading”, “objection, compound”, “objection, asked and answered”); borderline or situational objections (“objection, vague”, “objection, calls for speculation”); and improper objections (“objection, relevance”).

Cornell Law School adds some common objections include: irrelevant; violation of the best evidence rule; violation of the parol evidence rule; and, as above, “asked and answered”.

So what does a “compound objection” mean, specifically?

What is the meaning of ‘Objection, compound’ in the context of Johnny Depp’s deposition?

If an attorney asks a witness multiple questions at once, according to the Florida Bar’s summary of a “compound” objection, “it is proper to object that the question is compound”.

Such questions, it continues, can be “ambiguous and confusing” for witnesses. As a result, courts “generally sustain these objections” if the problem is “not corrected during the deposition by the questioning attorney after an objection has been made”.

  • MUSIC: How to get a presale code for Lizzo’s 2022 Special Tour and shop tickets
Objection leading là gì

For more on deposition questioning, objections and procedure, read guideline 6 of the Maryland Code and Court Rules.

Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute defines a “compound question” as “a singularly phrased inquiry that entails multiple component questions within its framework”. In other words, it’s a single question with many answers. This might confuse, distract or overwhelm a witness undergoing deposition.

‘Objection sustained’ and ‘objection hearsay’ meanings explained

What is the Hearsay Rule? Indiana Law School’s introduction to it defines hearsay, in the context of a court case, as “a statement that was made outside of the courtroom, which asserts facts and is now offered in court to prove the truth of the facts asserted”.

  • CULTURE: What is the meaning of ‘Nous tous’? Emmanuel Macron wins second term

Lancaster | Official Trailer

BridTV

9702

Lancaster | Official Trailer

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/pQE-lV22sTA/hqdefault.jpg

999727

999727

center

22886

The meaning of “Objection, hearsay” is therefore that the objecting attorney believes the witness’ statements are based on statements made outside the courtroom. Read more on lawyer Gerald Oginski’s website.

If a judge sustains an objection, that means they agree with the objection. They disallow the question, testimony or evidence. The alternative is the judge overrules the objection. That means they disagree with the objection. In these instances, the deposition can continue as before.

Have something to tell us about this article?

Let us know

Objection leading là gì

Bruno Cooke

Bruno is a novelist, amateur screenwriter and journalist with interests in digital media, storytelling, film and politics. He’s lived in France, China, Sri Lanka and the Philippines, but returned to the UK for a degree (and because of the pandemic) in 2020. His articles have appeared in Groundviews, Forge Press and The Friday Poem, and most are readable on Medium or onurbicycle.com.