Địa chỉ : 50 Nguyễn Xuân Khoát, P. Tân Thành, Q. Tân Phú, TPHCM Show
Điện thoại : 028 3812 3816 - Hotline : 0909 212 772 Email : [email protected] Website : www.econnect.com.vn Giấy chứng nhận ĐKKD số: 4102051249 do sở Kế Hoạch và Đầu Tư cấp ngày 19/06/2006 Nâng cấp và thay Cạc hình Laptop dòng máy trạm Dell Precision M4700 Nâng cấp và thay Cạc hinh laptop dòng máy trạm HP Elitebook 8570W Tương thích thế cho cạc hình Nvida Quadro K1000M , K2000M , AMD FirePro M4000 Miễn phí công thay thế lắp ráp Bảo hành 03 tháng Thông số Video Card Nvidia Quadro K2000M CodenameN14P-Q3ArchitectureKeplerPipelines384 - unifiedCore Speed745 MHzMemory Speed1800 MHzMemory Bus Width128 BitMemory TypeDDR3Max. Amount of Memory2048 MBShared MemorynoDirectXDirectX 11, Shader 5.0technology28 nmFeaturesOptimus, PhysX, Verde Drivers, CUDA, 3D Vision, 3DTV PlayNotebook Sizemedium sized Hình ảnh cạc màn hình K2000M  General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Pipelines / CUDA cores512384Core clock speed993 MHz745 MHzBoost clock speed1072 MHzno dataNumber of transistors1,870 million1,270 millionManufacturing process technology28 nm28 nmPower consumption (TDP)40 Watt55 WattTexture fill rate31.7823.84Floating-point performance1,017 gflops572.2 gflops Size and compatibilityInformation on Quadro M1000M and Quadro K2000M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard. Laptop sizelargemedium sizedInterfaceMXM-A (3.0)MXM-A (3.0)Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data MemoryParameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Memory typeGDDR5DDR3Maximum RAM amount2 GB/4 GB2 GBMemory bus width128 Bit128 BitMemory clock speed5000 MHz1800 MHzMemory bandwidth80 GB/s28.8 GB/sShared memory-- Video outputs and portsTypes and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputsDisplay Port1.2no data TechnologiesSupported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. Optimus++3D Vision Pro+no dataMosaic+no datanView Display Management+no dataOptimus+no data API supportList of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions. DirectX1212 (11_0)Shader Model5.05.1OpenGL4.54.6OpenCL1.21.2Vulkan++CUDA5.0+ Synthetic benchmark performanceNon-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale. Combined synthetic benchmark scoreThis is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. M1000M outperforms K2000M by 185% in our combined benchmark results. PassmarkThis is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% M1000M outperforms K2000M by 184% in Passmark. 3DMark 11 Performance GPU3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy. Benchmark coverage: 17% M1000M outperforms K2000M by 135% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU. 3DMark Fire Strike GraphicsFire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 14% M1000M outperforms K2000M by 234% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics. 3DMark Cloud Gate GPUCloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 14% M1000M outperforms K2000M by 167% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU. GeekBench 5 OpenCLGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 9% M1000M outperforms K2000M by 195% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL. GeekBench 5 VulkanGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 5% M1000M outperforms K2000M by 194% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan. GeekBench 5 CUDAGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA. Benchmark coverage: 4% M1000M outperforms K2000M by 255% in GeekBench 5 CUDA. Unigine Heaven 3.0This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine. Benchmark coverage: 4% M1000M outperforms K2000M by 164% in Unigine Heaven 3.0. Octane Render OctaneBenchThis is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists. Benchmark coverage: 4% M1000M outperforms K2000M by 167% in Octane Render OctaneBench. Gaming performanceLet's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Average FPS across all PC gamesHere are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: Full HD39 25 4K13 4−5 Performance in popular gamesFull HD Low Preset Cyberpunk 207712−14 5−6 Full HD Medium Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey14−16 +400% 3−4 −400% Assassin's Creed Valhalla9−10 +200% 3−4 −200% Battlefield 524−27 +380% 5−6 −380% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare21−24 +75% 12−14 −75% Cyberpunk 207712−14 +140% 5−6 −140% Far Cry 518−20 +500% 3−4 −500% Far Cry New Dawn18−20 +533% 3−4 −533% Forza Horizon 424−27 +225% 8−9 −225% Hitman 318−20 +260% 5−6 −260% Horizon Zero Dawn14−16 +367% 3−4 −367% Red Dead Redemption 212−14 +117% 6−7 −117% Shadow of the Tomb Raider16−18 +88.9% 9−10 −88.9% Watch Dogs: Legion12−14 0−1 Full HD High Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey14−16 +400% 3−4 −400% Assassin's Creed Valhalla9−10 +200% 3−4 −200% Battlefield 524−27 +380% 5−6 −380% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare21−24 +75% 12−14 −75% Cyberpunk 207712−14 +140% 5−6 −140% Far Cry 518−20 +500% 3−4 −500% Far Cry New Dawn18−20 +533% 3−4 −533% Forza Horizon 424−27 +225% 8−9 −225% Hitman 318−20 +260% 5−6 −260% Horizon Zero Dawn14−16 +367% 3−4 −367% Metro Exodus10−12 +267% 3−4 −267% Red Dead Redemption 212−14 +117% 6−7 −117% Shadow of the Tomb Raider16−18 +88.9% 9−10 −88.9% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt19 +217% 6−7 −217% Watch Dogs: Legion12−14 0−1 Full HD Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey14−16 +400% 3−4 −400% Assassin's Creed Valhalla9−10 +200% 3−4 −200% Battlefield 524−27 +380% 5−6 −380% Cyberpunk 207712−14 +140% 5−6 −140% Far Cry 518−20 +500% 3−4 −500% Far Cry New Dawn18−20 +533% 3−4 −533% Forza Horizon 424−27 +225% 8−9 −225% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt11 +83.3% 6−7 −83.3% Watch Dogs: Legion12−14 0−1 1440p High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare10−12 +120% 5−6 −120% Hitman 312−14 +140% 5−6 −140% Horizon Zero Dawn12−14 +62.5% 8−9 −62.5% Metro Exodus5−6 +400% 1−2 −400% Red Dead Redemption 25−6 +400% 1−2 −400% Shadow of the Tomb Raider10−11 +100% 5−6 −100% 1440p Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey5−6 +400% 1−2 −400% Assassin's Creed Valhalla1−2 0−1 Battlefield 59−10 +200% 3−4 −200% Cyberpunk 20773−4 +200% 1−2 −200% Far Cry 510−12 +267% 3−4 −267% Far Cry New Dawn10−11 +233% 3−4 −233% Forza Horizon 412−14 +500% 2−3 −500% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt6−7 +200% 2−3 −200% Watch Dogs: Legion2−3 0−1 4K High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare5−6 +150% 2−3 −150% Hitman 37−8 +133% 3−4 −133% Horizon Zero Dawn8−9 +33.3% 6−7 −33.3% Metro Exodus1−2 0−1 Red Dead Redemption 24−5 +300% 1−2 −300% Shadow of the Tomb Raider3−4 +200% 1−2 −200% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt7 +250% 2−3 −250% 4K Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey3−4 +200% 1−2 −200% Assassin's Creed Valhalla2−3 0−1 Battlefield 54−5 +300% 1−2 −300% Cyberpunk 20771−2 0−1 Far Cry 56−7 +100% 3−4 −100% Far Cry New Dawn9−10 +50% 6−7 −50% Forza Horizon 49−10 +350% 2−3 −350% Watch Dogs: Legion2−3 0−1 This is how M1000M and K2000M compete in popular games: 1080p resolution:
4K resolution:
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
All in all, in popular games:
Advantages and disadvantagesPerformance score 7.43 2.61 Recency 2 October 2015 1 June 2012 Cost $200.89 $265.27 Pipelines / CUDA cores 512 384 Memory bandwidth 80 28.8 Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 55 Watt The Quadro M1000M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K2000M in performance tests. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Cast your own voteDo you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. Quadro M1000M Quadro K2000M Similar GPU comparisonsWe selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. User ratings: view and submitHere you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. Rate NVIDIA Quadro M1000M on a scale of 1 to 5: Rate NVIDIA Quadro K2000M on a scale of 1 to 5: Questions and commentsHere you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. |
