ReferencesBales, R.F. (1958). Task roles and social roles in problem-solving groups. In E. Maccoby, T.M. Newcomb, & E.L. Hartley (Eds.),Readings in social psychology (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Google Scholar Bales, R.F., & Slater, P.E. (1955). Role differentiation in small decision-making groups. In T. Parsons,
R.F. Bales, J. Olds, M. Zelditch, Jr., & P.E. Slater (Eds.),Family, socialization and interaction process. New York: Free Press.
Google Scholar Blake, R., & Mouton, J.S. (1964).The Managerial grid. Houston, Texas: Gulf. Google Scholar Burke, P. (1972). Leadership role differentiation. In C.G. McClintock (Ed.),Experimental social psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Google
Scholar Dansereau, F., Jr., Graen, G., & Haga, W.J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 46–78. Article
Google Scholar Fiedler, F.E. (1967).A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
Fiedler, F.E., Chemers, M.M., & Mahar, L. (1976).Improving leadership effectiveness: The leader match concept. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar Fleishman E.A. (1953). The description of supervisory
behavior.Journal of Applied Psychology, 37, 1–6. Article
Google Scholar Fleishman, E.A. (1973). Twenty years
of consideration and structure. In E.A. Fleishman & J. Hunt (Eds.),Current developments in the study of leadership. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. Google Scholar Fleishman, E.A., & Harris, E.F. (1962). Patterns of leadership behavior related to employee grievances and
turnover.Personnel Psychology, 15, 43–56. Article
Google
Scholar Fleishman, E.A., Harris, E.F., & Burtt, H.E. (1955).Leadership and supervision in industry. Columbus, Ohio: Bureau of Educational Research, Ohio State University. Google Scholar Foa, U., Mitchell, T., & Fiedler, F. (1971). Differentiation
matching.Behavioral Science, 16, 130–142. Article
PubMed
Google Scholar Halpin, A.W., & Winer,
B.J. (1957). A factorial study of the leader behavior descriptions. In R.M. Stogdill & A.E. Coons (Eds.),Leader behavior: Its description and measurement. Columbus, Ohio: College of Administrative Science, Ohio State University. Google Scholar Hosking, D. (1978).A critical evaluation of Fiedler’s predictor measures of leadership
effectiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Warwick. Hosking, D. (1979a). A critical evaluation of the “goal hierarchy” interpretation of LPC scores.University of Aston Management Centre Working Paper Series, no. 136. Hosking, D. (1979b). Differentiation matching and Fiedler’s contingency hypothesis: A critique.University of Aston Management Centre Working Paper Series, no. 139. Hosking, D. (1981). A critical evaluation of Fiedler’s contingency hypothesis. In G.M. Stephenson & J.H. Davis (Eds.),Progress in applied social psychology (vol. 1). Chichester: Wiley. Google Scholar Hosking, D., & Schriesheim, C.A. (1980). Issues and non-issues in group interactions.
Unpublished paper, Department of Organizational Behavior, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. Google Scholar -
Kerr, S., & Schriesheim, C.A. (1974). Consideration, initiating structure and organizational criteria: An update of Korman’s 1966 review.Personnel Psychology, 27, 555–568. Article
Google Scholar Kerr, S., Schriesheim, C.A., Murphy, C.J., & Stogdill, R.M. (1974). Toward a contingency theory of leadership based upon the consideration and initiating structure literature.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 12, 62–82. Article
Google Scholar Korman, A.K. (1966). “Consideration,” “initiating structure,” and organizational criteria: A review.Personnel Psychology, 19, 349–361. Article
Google Scholar Larson, L.L., Hunt, J.G., & Osborn, R.N. (1976). The great hi-hi leader behavior myth: A lesson from Occam’s razor.Academy of Management Journal, 19, 628–641. Article
Google Scholar Lowin, A., Hrapchak, W.J., & Kavanagh, M.J. (1969). Consideration and initiating structure: An experimental investigation of leadership traits.Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 238–253. Article
Google Scholar Maier, N.R.F. (1952).Principles of human relations. New York. Wiley. Book
Google Scholar Reddin, W.J. (1970).Managerial effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar Schriesheim, C., & Kerr, S. (1974). Psychometric properties of the Ohio State leadership scales.Psychological Bulletin, 81, 756–765. Article
PubMed
Google Scholar Sherif,
M., & Sherif, C.W. (1969).Social psychology. New York: Harper & Row. Google Scholar Stogdill, R.E. (1973). Discussant’s comments
and general discussion. Reported in E.A. Fleishman & J.G. Hunt (Eds.),Current developments in the study of leadership. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. Google Scholar Vroom, V.H. (1960).Some personality determinants of the effects of participation. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:
Prentice-Hall. Google Scholar Weissenberg, P., & Kavanagh, M.J. (1972). The independence of initiating
structure and consideration: A review of the evidencePersonnel Psychology, 25, 119–130. Article
Google Scholar
Download references
What is initiating structure and consideration?
According to the findings of these studies, leaders exhibit two types of behaviors to facilitate goal accomplishment: People-oriented (consideration) Task oriented (initiating structure)
Which of the following is an example of initiating structure?
Assigning tasks to individuals or work groups, letting subordinates know what is expected of them, deciding how work should be done, making schedules, encouraging adherence to rules and regulations, and motivating subordinates to do a good job are all examples of initiating structure.
Are consideration and initiating structure mutually exclusive?
The Ohio State Leadership Studies also showed that initiating structure and consideration are two distinct dimensions and not mutually exclusive.
What are the two main dimensions of the Ohio studies into leadership?
The two dimensions of leadership behavior as per the Ohio state studies are initiating structure and consideration.
|