How do implied powers relate to the necessary and proper clause Quizlet

Recommended textbook solutions

How do implied powers relate to the necessary and proper clause Quizlet

American Corrections

11th EditionMichael D. Reisig, Todd R. Clear

160 solutions

How do implied powers relate to the necessary and proper clause Quizlet

Criminal Justice in America

9th EditionChristina Dejong, Christopher E. Smith, George F Cole

105 solutions

How do implied powers relate to the necessary and proper clause Quizlet

American Government

1st EditionGlen Krutz

412 solutions

How do implied powers relate to the necessary and proper clause Quizlet

Government in America: Elections and Updates Edition

16th EditionGeorge C. Edwards III, Martin P. Wattenberg, Robert L. Lineberry

269 solutions

The "Elastic Clause" of the Constitution grants Congress power to pass unspecified laws "necessary and proper" for the exercise of its expressed powers
Implied powers have often been controversial
Over time, Congress's powers have grown as more and more kinds of government activity have been accepted as implied powers

This last power is enshrined in Article I, Section 8, Clause 18—one of the most important and controversial clauses in the entire Constitution. This "Necessary and Proper Clause" (sometimes also called the "Elastic Clause") grants Congress a set of so-called implied powers—that is, powers not explicitly named in the Constitution but assumed to exist due to their being necessary to implement the expressed powers that are named in Article I.

But what the heck does that mean, exactly?

We know that Congress has the power to regulate interstate commerce. (It says so right there in Article I, Section 8, Clause 3.) But does Congress have the power to, say, make a rule setting a national minimum wage? Is that minimum-wage law really "necessary and proper" for Congress to exercise its authority to regulate interstate commerce?

Today, most people would say yes. We do have a national minimum-wage law, and very few people now argue that the law should be considered unconstitutional. We interpret the commerce clause pretty loosely, assuming that Congress has the legitimate authority to pass all kinds of economic rules and regulations as a "necessary and proper" part of exercising its broad commerce powers.

But this wasn't always the case. Throughout the late nineteenth century and well into the 1930s, the Supreme Court insisted that such laws were unconstitutional, that they were not a "necessary and proper" part of regulating interstate commerce at all and thus the government had no right to enforce them.

What changed? Not the Constitution. But our understanding of what's "necessary and proper" today simply isn't the same as what it was a century ago. Now you can see why Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 is sometimes called "the Elastic Clause"—the definition of "necessary and proper" can be stretched pretty far in one direction or the other, depending upon the dominant political trends of the moment.

And because the definition of "necessary and proper" is so subjective, the implied powers that derive from the Necessary and Proper Clause have often been extremely controversial and subject to ferocious political disagreement. And this has been the case since at least George Washington's presidency, if not even before.

Because states are basically independent of one another, some means is needed to prevent criminals from escaping justice simply by going from one state to another.For this reason, the Constitution provides:

"A person charged in any state with treason, felony, or other crime, who shall flee from justice, and be found in another State, shall, on demand of the executive authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the State having jurisdiction of the crime."
--Article 4, Section 2.

This clause provides for the extradition of fugitives.Congress has made the governor of the state to which fugitives have fled responsible for returning them.The Supreme Court has softened the meaning of the extradition provision by ruling that a governor is not required to return a fugitive to another state.Although extradition is routine in the vast majority of cases, occasionally a governor will refuse to return a fugitive to Arkansas because, the governor said, prison conditions in Arkansas were inhumane.Arkansas officials could do nothing about the governor's decision.In recent years Congress has acted to close the extradition loophole by making it a federal crime to flee from one state to another in order to avoid prosecution for a felony.

How do implied powers relate to Necessary and Proper Clause?

Congress, Implied Powers, and Article 1 of the Constitution Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution has a clause known as the implied powers, or elastic, clause. It specifies that Congress can make “all Laws which shall be necessary and proper” to carry out its stated or enumerated powers.

What is the implied powers expressed by the Necessary and Proper Clause in the Constitution quizlet?

Necessary and Proper Clause: Gives Congress the power to make all laws it feels are needed to execute its powers. Strict Constitutionist: One who wants Congress to only use only those powers specifically given to it in the Constitution.

Does the Necessary and Proper Clause gives Congress implied powers?

While the Constitution explicitly states certain congressional powers, the Constitution also gives Congress the implied power to carry out its enumerated powers.

Which of Congress's powers is implied through the Necessary and Proper Clause quizlet?

the necessary and proper clause gives Congress the power to make all laws "necessary and proper" for executing its powers. implied powers allow Congress to create laws to carry out its duties.