Home > Smartphone comparison > Redmi 9C vs Galaxy A12 – which one to choose? Here we compared two budget smartphones: the 6.53-inch Xiaomi Redmi 9C (with MediaTek Helio G35) that was released on June 30, 2020, against the Samsung Galaxy A12, which is powered by MediaTek Helio P35 and came out 5 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the gadgets. - Differences
- Review
- Specs
- Benchmarks
- Battery life
- Camera
- Comments (1)
An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A12 - Modern USB Type-C port
- Supports 15W fast charging
- Uses a faster type of memory: LPDDR4 1866 MHz
- Delivers 14% higher maximum brightness (475 against 418 nits)
- Has an ultra-wide angle camera lens
- More recent OS version: Android 11 versus 10
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
You can enter your local price of these phones (in USD or any other currency) and click on the "Calculate" button to see which one has a better value for money. Comparison table of technical specifications and tests Type | IPS LCD | PLS TFT | Size | 6.53 inches | 6.5 inches | Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels | 720 x 1600 pixels | Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 | PPI | 269 ppi | 270 ppi | Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz | HDR support | No | No | Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass | Screen-to-body ratio | 81.1% | 82.1% | Display tests RGB color space | 92.9% | 96.3% | PWM | 17120 Hz | 337 Hz | Response time | 47 ms | 52 ms | Contrast | 881:1 | 864:1 | Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4] Height | 164.9 mm (6.49 inches) | 164 mm (6.46 inches) | Width | 77 mm (3.03 inches) | 75.8 mm (2.98 inches) | Thickness | 9 mm (0.35 inches) | 8.9 mm (0.35 inches) | Weight | 196 gramm (6.91 oz) | 205 gramm (7.23 oz) | Waterproof | No | No | Rear material | Plastic | Plastic | Frame material | Plastic | Plastic | Colors | Gray, Blue, Green | White, Black, Blue, Red | Fingerprint scanner | Yes, rear | Yes, in home button | Tests of Xiaomi Redmi 9C and Samsung Galaxy A12 in the benchmarks SoC Chipset | MediaTek Helio G35 | MediaTek Helio P35 | Max. clock | 2300 MHz | 2300 MHz | CPU cores | 8 (8) | 8 (4 + 4) | Architecture | - 8 cores at 2.3 GHz: Cortex-A53 | - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A53 - 4 cores at 2.3 GHz: Cortex-A53 | Lithography process | 12 nanometers | 12 nanometers | Graphics | IMG PowerVR GE8320 | IMG PowerVR GE8320 | GPU clock | 680 MHz | 680 MHz | FLOPS | ~54.4 GFLOPS | ~44.8 GFLOPS | Memory RAM size | 2, 3 GB | 3, 4, 6 GB | Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4 | Memory clock | 933 MHz | 1866 MHz | Channels | 1 | 2 | Storage Storage size | 32, 64 GB | 32, 64, 128 GB | Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 | Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD | Memory card max. size | Up to 256 GB | Up to 1024 GB | CPU | 34029 | 30704 | GPU | 16569 | 13115 | Memory | 26942 | 25477 | UX | 30327 | 29575 | Total score | 108022 | 99745 | ▶️ Submit your AnTuTu result Operating system | Android 10 | Android 10.0 (Can be upgraded to Android 11) | ROM | MIUI 12 | One UI 3.1 Core | OS size | 18 GB | 13 GB | Specifications Capacity | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | Charge power | 10 W | 15 W | Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po | Replaceable | No | No | Wireless charging | No | No | Reverse charging | No | No | Fast charging | No | Yes (20% in 30 min) | Full charging time | 2:59 hr | 3:03 hr | Battery life tests Web browsing | - | 16:07 hr | Watching video | - | 12:14 hr | Gaming | - | 06:10 hr | Standby | - | 153 hr | Smartphone Battery Life Ranking Specs and camera test of smartphones Main camera Matrix | 13 megapixels | 48 megapixels | Image resolution | 4128 x 3096 | 8000 x 6000 | Zoom | Digital | Digital | Flash | LED | LED | Stabilization | Digital | Digital | 8K video recording | No | No | 4K video recording | No | No | 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS | Slow motion | No | No | Angle of widest lens | - | 123° | Lenses | 3 (13 MP + 5 MP + 2 MP) | 4 (48 MP + 5 MP + 2 MP + 2 MP) | Wide (main) lens | - 13 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Pixel size: 1.12 micron - Sensor: 1/3.1" (CMOS) - Phase autofocus | - 48 MP - Aperture: f/2.0 - Focal length: 26 mm - Pixel size: 0.8 micron - Sensor: 1/2", Samsung S5KGM2 (ISOCELL CMOS) - Phase autofocus | Ultra-wide lens | - | - 5 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 | Macro lens | - 5 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 | - 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 | Depth lens | - 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 | - 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 | Camera features | - Bokeh mode | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode | Samples | - | Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy A12 from DxOMark | Selfie camera Megapixels | 5 megapixels | 8 megapixels | Image resolution | 2560 x 1960 | 3264 x 2448 | Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 | Pixel size | 1.12 microns | - | Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS | Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) | Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot | Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 | Bluetooth features | LE, HID, A2DP | PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP | USB type | Micro USB | USB Type-C | USB version | 2 | 2 | USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | NFC* | Yes | Yes | Infrared port | No | No | Network Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 | Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano | Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby | eSIM support* | No | No | Hybrid slot | No | No | LTE Cat* | 4 | 7 | 5G support | No | No | Speakers | Mono | Mono | Headphone audio jack | Yes | Yes | FM radio | Yes | Yes | Dolby Atmos | No | Yes | Category | Budget | Budget | Announced | June 2020 | November 2020 | Release date | September 2020 | December 2020 | SAR (head) | 0.355 W/kg | 0.67 W/kg | SAR (body) | 0.729 W/kg | 1.38 W/kg | Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Fingerprint | - Proximity sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Fingerprint | *Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country. After analyzing all the data, we think that the Samsung Galaxy A12 is definitely a better buy. You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
|