What are the complication of breech presentation?

Affiliations

  • PMID: 18803893

Maternal and neonatal complications in term breech delivered vaginally

Samina Jadoon et al. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2008 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the maternal and neonatal complications in terms of genital tract trauma to mother, perinatal mortality, Apgar score at 5 minutes and neonatal trauma in all singleton term breech cases delivered vaginally.

Study design: Case series.

Place and duration of study: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Bolan Medical Complex Hospital, Quetta, from May 2005 to March 2006.

Methodology: A 100 consecutive patients with singleton breech presentation, whether booked or unbooked, were admitted and delivered vaginally in hospital during the study period. They were studied for maternal and neonatal complications. Maternal complication included any genital tract trauma during delivery while neonatal complications were perinatal mortality, low Apgar score (less than eight at 5 minutes) and birth trauma.

Results: There were a total 3977 deliveries during this study period, 145 breech presentation (incidence 3.6%). Out of those, 100 were included in the study. All were unbooked cases, 87% were multigravida while 13% were primigravida. An Apgar score of eight was recorded in 87% babies while 10% had an Apgar score of less than eight after 5 minutes. There were 3 still births and one neonatal death. Aggregated perinatal mortality rate was 40/1000 live births. Only one baby had birth trauma (Erb's paralysis) during vaginal breech delivery. Ninety seven (97%) mothers had no complications while only 3 (3%) had complications. Out of these, one had cervical tear and 2 had vaginal tears.

Conclusion: Offering a trial of vaginal breech delivery to strictly selected and well-counselled patients remains an appropriate option without compromising perinatal and maternal outcome. It also decreases the rate of operative delivery for this malpresentation.

Similar articles

  • Breech delivery and foetal outcome: a review of 291 cases.

    Mekbib TA. Mekbib TA. Ethiop Med J. 1995 Jul;33(3):175-82. Ethiop Med J. 1995. PMID: 7588656

  • Management trend and safety of vaginal delivery for term breech fetuses in a tertiary care hospital of Karachi, Pakistan.

    Mohammed NB, NoorAli R, Anandakumar C, Qureshi RN, Luby S. Mohammed NB, et al. J Perinat Med. 2001;29(3):250-9. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2001.036. J Perinat Med. 2001. PMID: 11447931 Review.

  • Singleton vaginal breech delivery at term: still a safe option.

    Alarab M, Regan C, O'Connell MP, Keane DP, O'Herlihy C, Foley ME. Alarab M, et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Mar;103(3):407-12. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000113625.29073.4c. Obstet Gynecol. 2004. PMID: 14990399

  • Outcome of 496 term singleton breech deliveries in a tertiary center.

    Daniel Y, Fait G, Lessing JB, Jaffa A, David MP, Kupferminc MJ. Daniel Y, et al. Am J Perinatol. 1998 Feb;15(2):97-101. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-993906. Am J Perinatol. 1998. PMID: 9514133

  • Breech delivery at term: a critical review of the literature.

    Cheng M, Hannah M. Cheng M, et al. Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Oct;82(4 Pt 1):605-18. Obstet Gynecol. 1993. PMID: 8377990 Review.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

  • Medical

    • MedlinePlus Health Information
  • Research Materials

    • NCI CPTC Antibody Characterization Program

References

  1. Speert, H., 1958, Essays in Eponymy, Obstetric and Gynecologic Milestones, Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cianfrani, T., 1960, A Short History of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Charles C Thomas, Springfield, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Marx, R., 1949, The birth of an emperor, Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 89:366.

    Google Scholar 

  4. DeLee, J. B., 1939, Year Book of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Year Book Medical Publishers, Chicago, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hollick, F., 1848, The Matrons Manual of Midwifery and the Diseases of Women during Pregnancy, The American News Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Piper, E. B., and Bachman, C., 1929, The prevention of fetal injuries in breech delivery,J. Am. Med. Assoc. 92:217.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  7. Moore, W. T., and Steptoe, P. P., 1943, The experience of the Johns Hopkins Hospital with breech presentation: An analysis of 1,444 cases, South. Med. J. 36:295.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  8. Hall, J. E., and Kohl, S., 1956, Breech presentation, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 72:977.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Todd, W. D., and Steer, C. M., 1963, Term breech: Review of 1,006 term breech deliveries, Obstet. Gynecol. 22:583.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Morgan, H. S., and Kane, S. H., 1964, An analysis of 16,327 breech births,/. Am. Med. Assoc. 187:262.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hall, J. E., Kohl, S. G., O’Brien, F., et al., 1965, Breech presentation and perinatal mortality, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 91:655.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Morley, G. W., 1967, Breech presentation-A 15-year review, Obstet. Gynecol. 30:745.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Neilson, D. R., 1970, Management of the large breech infant, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 107:345.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Diddle, A. W., 1972, A study of 695 breech deliveries, Med. Times 100:76.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Collea, J. V., Rabin, S. C, and Quilligan, E. J., Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., manuscript in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vartan, C. K., 1940, Cause of breech presentation, Lancet 1:595.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  17. Weisman, A. I., 1944, An antepartum study of fetal polarity and rotation, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 48:550.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vartan, C. K., 1945, The behavior of the fetus in utero, with special reference to the incidence of breech presentation at term,/. Obstet. Gynaecol. Br. Common. 52:417.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tompkins, P., 1946, An inquiry into the causes of breech presentation, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 51:595.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Stevenson, C. S., 1950, The principal cause of breech presentation in single term pregnancies, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 60:41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Collea, J. V., Benedetti, T., Hanson, V., et al., Twin gestation, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., manuscript in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Braun, F. H. T., Jones, K. L., and Smith, D. W., 1975, Breech presentation as an indicator of fetal abnormality, J. Pediatr. 86:419.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Brenner, W. E., Bruce, R. D., and Hendricks, C. H., 1974, The characteristics and perils of breech presentation, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 118:700.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Robinson, G. W., 1968, Birth characteristics of children with congenital dislocation of the hip, Am. J. Epidemiol. 87:275.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Axelrod, F. B., Leistner, H. L., and Porges, R. F., 1974, Breech presentation among infants with familial dysautonomia,J. Pediatr. 84:107.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Stevenson, C. S., 1949, X-ray visualization of the placenta: Experiences with soft tissue and cystographic techniques in the diagnosis of placenta previa, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 58:15.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Johnson, C. E., 1970, Breech presentation at term, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 106:865.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Stein, I. F., 1941, Deflexion attitudes in breech presentation, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 117:1430.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  29. Saling, E., and Müller-Holve, W., 1975, External cephalic version under tocolysis, J. Perinat. Med. 3:115.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Patterson, S. P., Mulliniks, R. C, and Schreier, P. C, 1967, Breech presentation in the primigravida, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 98:404.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Fischer-Rasmussen, W., and Trolle, D., 1967, Abdominal versus vaginal delivery in breech presentation, Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 46:69.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  32. Potter, E. L., 1940, Fetal and neonatal deaths, a Statistical analysis of 2,000 autopsies, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 115:996.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  33. Potter, M. G., Heaton, C. E., and Douglas, G. W., 1960, Intrinsic fetal risk in breech delivery, Obstet. Gynecol. 15:158.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kian, L. S., 1963, Breech presentation, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 86:1050.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Eliot, B. W., and Hill, J. G., 1972, Method of breech management incorporating use of fetal blood sampling, Br. Med. J. 4:703.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Wheeler, T., and Greene, K., 1975, Fetal heart rate monitoring during breech delivery, Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 82:208.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Teteris, N. J., Botschner, A. W., Ullery, J. C., et al., 1970, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 107:762.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Goethals, T. R., 1940, Management of breech delivery, Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 70:620.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Holland, E., 1922, Cranial stress in the fetus during labor and on the effects of excessive stress on the intracranial contents with an analysis of eighty-one cases of torn tentorium cerebelli and subdural cerebral hemorrhage, J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Br. Emp. 29:549.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  40. Rubin, A., and Grimm, G., 1963, Results in breech presentation, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 86:1048.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Gold, E. M., Clyman, M. J., Wallace, H. M., et al., 1953, Obstetric factors in birth injury, Obstet. Gynecol. 1:43.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ralis, Z. A., 1968, Trauma to newborn babies during breech delivery. Part I. Visceral organs and locomotor system, M.D. thesis, Faculty of Pediatrics, Charles University, Prague.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ralis, Z. A., 1975, Birth trauma to muscles in babies born by breech delivery and its possible fatal consequences, Arch. Dis. Child. 50:4.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Ward, S. V., and Sellers, T. B., 1950, Controversial issues in breech presentation, South. Med. J. 43:879.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  45. Tank, E. S., Davis, R., Holt, J. F., et al., 1971, Mechanism of trauma during breech delivery, Obstet. Gynecol. 38:761.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Tan, K. L., 1973, Brachial palsy, J . Obstet. Gynaecol. Br. Commonw. 80:60.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Byers, R. K., 1975, Spinal-cord injuries during birth, Dev. Med. Child. Neurol. 17:103.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Brans, Y. W., and Cassady, G., 1975, Neonatal spinal cord injuries, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 123:918.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Wilcox, H. L., 1949, The attitude of the fetus in breech presentation, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 58:478.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Brakemann, O., 1936, Haltung und Konfiguration des Kindlichen Kopfes bei der Beckenendlage, Berurtsch. Gynaekol. 112:154.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Lazar, M. R., and Salvaggio, A. T., 1959, Hyperextension of the fetal head in breech presentation, Obstet. Gynecol. 14:198.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Caterini, H., Langer, A., Sama, J. C, et al., 1975, Fetal risk in hyperextension of the fetal head in breech presentation, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 123:632.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Bhagwanani, S. G., Price, H. V., Laurence, K. M., et al., 1973, Risks and prevention of cervical cord injury in the management of breech presentation with hyperextension of the fetal head, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 115:1159.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Towbin, A., 1964, Spinal cord and brain stem injury at birth, Arch. Pathol. 77:620.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Towbin, A., 1970, Central nervous system damage in the human fetus and newborn infant, Am.]. Dis. Child. 119:529.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Evrard, J. R., and Hilrich, N., 1952, Hyperextension of the head in breech presen-tation,J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Br. Emp. 59:244.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  57. Daugherty, C. M., Mickey, L. J., and Moore, J. T., 1953, Hyperextension of the fetal head in breech presentation, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 66:75.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Deacon, A. L., 1951, Hyperextension of the head in breech presentation, J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Br. Emp. 58:300.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Reis, R. A., and DeCosta, E. J., 1950, Hyperrotation and deflexion of the head in breech presentation, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 60:637.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Taylor, J. C, 1948, Breech presentation with hyperextension of the neck and intrauterine dislocation of cervical vertebrae, Obstet. Gynecol. 56:381.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Minogue, M., 1974, Vaginal breech delivery in multiparae, J. Ir. Med. Assoc. 67:117.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. MacArthur, J. L., 1964, Reduction of the hazards of breech presentation by external cephalic version, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 88:302.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Bock, J. E., 1969, The influence of prophylactic external cephalic version on the incidence of breech delivery, Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 48:215.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Ranney, B., 1973, The gentle art of external cephalic version, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 116:239.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Hibbard, L. T., and Schumann, W. R., 1973, Prophylactic external cephalic version in an obstetric practice, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 116:511.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Ellis, R., 1968, External cephalic version under anesthesia, J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Br. Commonw. 75:865.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Marcus, R. G., Crewe-Brown, H., Krawitz, S., et al., 1975, Feto-maternal hemorrhage following successful and unsuccessful attempts at external cephalic version, Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 82:578.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Colcher, A. E., and Sussman, W., 1944, A practical technique for roentgen pelvimetry with a new positioning, Am. J. Roentgenol. 51:207.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Eastman, N.J., 1948, Pelvic mensuration: A study in the perpetuation of error, Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 3:301.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Russell, J. G. B., and Richards, B., 1971, A review of pelvimetry data, Br. J. Radiol. 44:780.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Rovinsky, J. J., Miller, J. A., and Kaplan, S., 1973, Management of breech presentation at term, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 115:497.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Joyce, D. N., Giwa-Osagie, F., and Stevenson, G. W., 1975, Role of pelvimetry in active management of labour, Br. Med. J. 4:505.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Wolter, D. F., 1976, Patterns of management with breech presentation, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 125:733.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Harris, J. M., and Nissim, J. A., 1959, To do or not to do a cesarean section,/. Am. Med. Assoc. 169:570.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Zatuchni, G. I., and Andros, G. J., 1967, Prognostic index for vaginal delivery in breech presentation at term, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 98:854.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Schifrin, B. S., 1974, The case against pelvimetry, Contemp. Obstet. Gynecol. 4:77.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Kaupilla, O., 1975, The perinatal mortality in breech deliveries and observations on affecting factors, Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Beisher, N. A., 1966, Pelvic contracture in breech presentation,/. Obstet, Gynaecol. Br. Commonw. 73:421.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  79. Milner, R. D. G., 1975, Neonatal mortality of breech deliveries with and without forceps to the after-coming head, Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 82:783.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Reddin, P. C, 1974, Changing management of breech presentation, Missouri Med. 71:584.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Wright, R. C, 1959, Reduction of perinatal mortality and morbidity in breech delivery through routine use of cesarean section, Obstet. Gynecol. 14:758.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Lanka, L. D., and Nelson, H. B., 1969, Breech presentation with low fetal mortality — A comparative study, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 104:879.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Smith, R. S., and Oldham, R. R., 1970, Breech delivery, Obstet. Gynecol. 36:151.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Collea, J. V., Weghorst, G. R., and Paul, R. H., 1974, Singleton breech presentation-One year’s experience, in: Contributions to Gynecology and Obstetrics, Vol. 3 (G. P. Mandruzzato and P. G. Keller, eds.), S. Karger, Basle.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Collea, J. V., Rabin, S. C., Weghorst, G. R., et al., 1978, The randomized management of term frank breech presentation: Vaginal delivery vs. cesarean section, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 131:186.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Collea, J. V., Rabin, S. C, and Quilligan, E. J., The role of cesarean section in the management of breech presentation, manuscript in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Stewart, A. L., Turcan, D. M., Rawlings, G., et al., 1977, Prognosis for infants weighing 1,000 grams or less at birth, Arch. Dis. Child. 52:97.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Stewart, A. L., 1977, Follow-up of preterm infants, in: Preterm Labor: Proceedings of the 5th Study Group, Royal College of Ob-Gyn, London.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Zuspan, F. R., 1978, Problems encountered in the treatment of pregnancy-induced hypertension, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 131:591.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Kubli, F., Boos, W., and Ruutgers, H., 1976, Cesarean section in the management of singleton breech presentation, 5th European Congress of Perinatal Medicine, Uppsala, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Neimand, K. M., and Rosenthal, A. H., 1965, Oxytocin in breech presentation, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 93:230.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Bowen-Simpkins, P., and Fergusson, I. L. C., 1974, Lumbar epidural block and the breech presentation, Br. J. Anaesth. 46:420.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Crawford, J. S., 1975, Lumbar epidural analgesia for the singleton breech presentation, Anesthesia 30:119.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Pearse, W. H., and Danforth, D. N., 1977, Dystocia due to abnormal fetopelvic relations, in: Obstetrics and Gynecology, 3rd ed. (D. N. Danford, ed.), Harper & Row, Hagerstown, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

What are the risk factors for breech presentation?

Risk factors for breech presentation.
Lax uterus (usually associated with high maternal parity)..
Uterine anomalies (eg, bicornuate or septate uterus) or tumour..
Placenta praevia..
Abnormal pelvic brim..
Maternal smoking..
Maternal diabetes..
Fetal malformation (eg, hydrocephalus)..
Multiple pregnancy..

What are the risks of a breech baby?

In general, breech pregnancies aren't dangerous until it's time for the baby to be born. With breech deliveries, there is a higher risk for the baby to get stuck in the birth canal and for the baby's oxygen supply through the umbilical cord to get cut off.

What is the four types of breech presentation?

Types of breeches Frank breech (50-70%) - Hips flexed, knees extended (pike position) Complete breech (5-10%) - Hips flexed, knees flexed (cannonball position) Footling or incomplete (10-30%) - One or both hips extended, foot presenting.