Distributive bargaining is an adversarial type of negotiation in which it is assumed that any gain of a competitor is a loss to the other party. In game theory, that scenario is known as a zero-sum game. Show
Distributive bargaining is a realistic approach to some situations. Metaphorically, sharing a pie is commonly used to describe distributive bargaining: A pie is a limited resource and if one person gets more, the other person gets less. Some negotiators use unscrupulous tactics in that type of situation and may become secretive, manipulative, punitive or deceptive. An adversarial approach to negotiations can lead to less-than-optimum outcomes. Both parties could, for example, withhold information that would benefit the other party, resulting in a less favorable outcome than might otherwise be possible. According to research, hard bargainers are more likely to get what they want out of negotiations -- but that win may come at the cost of future business. Distributive bargaining contrasts with integrative bargaining, a more cooperative approach that seeks to maximize the benefit to both parties. In reality, most negotiations include elements of both distributive and integrative bargaining. This was last updated in July 2018 Continue Reading About distributive bargaining
Related Termsaction planAn action plan is a document that lists what steps must be taken to achieve a specific goal. See complete definitionHofstadter's lawHofstadter's law states that a project always takes longer than expected, even when the law is taken into account. See complete definitionperformance testingPerformance testing is a testing measure that evaluates the speed, responsiveness and stability of a computer, network, software ... See complete definitionWord of the Day adversarial MLAdversarial machine learning is a technique used in machine learning to fool or misguide a model with malicious input. Distributive Negotiation is a competitive strategy, whereas integrative negotiation uses a collaborative approach. ... In distributive negotiation, the parties self-interest and individual profit motivate the parties. Unlike, in integrative negotiation mutual interest and gain act as a motivation for the parties involved.
What is distributive negotiation?Distributive Bargaining. Distributive bargaining is a competitive bargaining strategy in which one party gains only if the other party loses something. It is used as a negotiation strategy to distribute fixed resources such as money, resources, assets, etc. between both the parties. What is an integrative negotiation?Integrative negotiation is often referred to as “win-win” and typically entails two or more issues to be negotiated. It often involves an agreement process that better integrates the aims and goals of all the involved negotiation participants through creative and collaborative problem-solving. What is an example of integrative negotiation?The classic example involves two teenagers and an orange. If there's only one orange in the refrigerator and both teenagers demand it simultaneously, a distributive bargain might well involve each of them getting half of it. ... The integrative bargain is obviously better for both. What are the differences between distributive and integrative bargaining quizlet?distributive bargaining: talking down a price to something manageable. Its identifying feature is that it operates under zero-sum conditions—that is, any gain I make is at your expense, and vice versa. integrative bargaining: Negotiation that seeks one or more settlements that can create a win-win solution. What are the 5 negotiation styles?Negotiators have a tendency to negotiate from one of five styles: competing, accommodating, avoiding, compromising, or collaborative. What are the characteristics of distributive negotiation?Distributive negotiation is a necessary way of resolving differences between parties with mutually exclusive goals. Parties to the negotiation will withhold as much information as possible to gain an advantage and at the same time, they will try to get as much information from the opposing party as possible. Why is integrative negotiation difficult?Integrative negotiation is difficult because you care about the relationship with the other person. Chances are you will continue to work with the other party in the future. ... If you can identify additional issues and share this information in the negotiation, there is a possibility that mutual agreement can be reached. What makes integrative negotiation different?Integrative negotiation. In contrast to the distributive negotiation strategy, the integrative negotiation strategy involves a mutually beneficial approach to negotiations, looking for results that are agreeable for all the negotiating parties. This kind of negotiation seeks to create value, rather than claim it. What are integrative tactics?Integrative bargaining (also called "interest-based bargaining," "win-win bargaining") is a negotiation strategy in which parties collaborate to find a "win-win" solution to their dispute. This strategy focuses on developing mutually beneficial agreements based on the interests of the disputants. What are the types of negotiation?There are various types of negotiation:
What is the back and forth in integrative negotiation?They define negotiation as “a back and forth communication designed to reach an agreement when you and the other side have some interests that are shared and others that are opposed”. What are the four major steps in the integrative negotiation process?There are four major steps in the integrative negotiation process: (1) identify and define the problem, (2) understand the problem and bring interests and needs to the surface, (3) gen- erate alternative solutions to the problem, and (4) evaluate those alternatives and select among them. What are the differences between distributive and integrative bargaining?Integrative Negotiation aims for mutual gain, whereas Distributive Negotiation aims for maximizing personal benefits. The outcome of Distributive Negotiation is always a win-lose scenario, whereas it's a win-win scenario for Integrative Negotiation.
Which of the following is a difference between distributive bargaining and integrative negotiation quizlet?Which of the following is a difference between distributive bargaining and integrative negotiation? Distributive bargaining is a win-lose approach to negotiations, whereas integrative negotiation is a win-win approach to negotiations.
What is a different characteristic between the distributive bargaining situations and integrative bargaining situations?Distributive bargaining, according to the University of Colorado Boulder, is the approach to bargaining (or negotiation) that is used when the parties are trying to divide something up or distribute something. It contrasts with integrative bargaining in which the parties are trying to make more of something.
What are the differences between integrative and distributive issues what is a compatible issue?For integrative negotiations to be successful, both parties must be motivated to work collaboratively rather than competitively, and the interests of both parties must be compatible. Distributive negotiations are used when two (or more) parties are trying to claim the maximum amount of profit or benefit for themselves.
|
