Which of the following was an important result of the proclamation of 1763?

On February 10, 1763, representatives from various American Indian tribes, as well as British, French, and Spanish leaders, met to negotiate the Treaty of Paris, which ended the French and Indian War (1754-1763). As outlined in the treaty, France gave up their lands in North America and handed them over to the British, including American Indian lands in the Ohio Country.

Following the signing of the treaty, American Indian tribes living in the Great Lakes region immediately rose up against the British for fear that they would settle their lands and push them west. In response to their growing frustration, many tribes congregated under the leadership of the Ottawa chief, Pontiac. During a campaign referred to as Pontiac’s Rebellion, American Indians of the Ohio Country and Great Lakes region fought to push colonial settlers off Native lands into the regions east of the Appalachian Mountains. The British monarchy decided to address the conflict by developing legislation that would subdue the fighting. On October 7, 1763, the British Board of Trade under approval of King George III issued the Proclamation of 1763.

This Proclamation established a variety of limiting legislature in regards to interaction with the American Indians, boundaries for territories, and governmental responsibility. The Proclamation Line, a component of the Proclamation itself, established the geographical limitations of colonial settlement. Any land that resided west of the Appalachian Mountains, from the southern area of the Hudson Bay to the region north of Florida were to be preserved for American Indian territories. The Proclamation prohibited colonists from settling west of the Appalachian Mountains, and those who settled the region previously, were required to relocate east of the colonial divide.

Since these lands were gained by Great Britain by defeating France in the French and Indian War, the British monarchy controlled all former French territories, including American Indian lands. However, to reduce friction, the American Indian lands were to be controlled by American Indian law and cultural policy with no interference from the colonial government. Colonists were also barred from having any interaction with the people who resided within the American Indian lands; trading between the two groups was no longer permitted. With the restriction of colonists solely to the inner, eastern coastlines the colonial government would now have an easier time to successfully execute and regulate taxing burdens on the citizenry; a noted strategy by the government to ease their way out of wartime debt. Overall, the Proclamation of 1763 disbanded colonial ambition to expand into the westward frontier.

The Proclamation of 1763 also founded four new colonies that were obtained in the aftermath of the French and Indian War; Quebec, West Florida, East Florida, and Grenada. Boundaries were set to define the stretch of each colony while also establishing local governments to manage the different regions.

Colonists were unnerved by this Proclamation because it inhibited their desire to expand their settlements, concluding that due to Great Britain's victory there was an unspoken right to the lands now allocated for American Indian reservations. The Proclamation did not prevent colonists from continuing their pursuit of new land, as many disregarded the provisions and continued their journey toward westward settlements. American Indians were displeased with the colonists' blatant violation of the Proclamation and conflict continued.

Finally, the Proclamation also heightened the colonists’ dissatisfaction with British rule. They did not appreciate the restriction of their travels or the trade limitations as outlined in the Proclamation. Eventually, paired with the various economic acts that the British government would come to pass to eliminate their growing debt, the Proclamation fueled tensions between the British monarchy and the colonists, thus leading to the development of the American Revolution.

A portion of eastern North America; the 1763 "proclamation line" is the border between the red and the pink areas.

The Royal Proclamation of 1763 was issued by King George III on 7 October 1763. It followed the Treaty of Paris (1763), which formally ended the Seven Years' War and transferred French territory in North America to Great Britain.[1] The Proclamation forbade all settlements west of a line drawn along the Appalachian Mountains, which was delineated as an Indian Reserve.[2] Exclusion from the vast region of Trans-Appalachia created discontent between Britain and colonial land speculators and potential settlers. The proclamation and access to western lands was one of the first significant areas of dispute between Britain and the colonies and would become a contributing factor leading to the American Revolution. The 1763 proclamation line is situated similar to the Eastern Continental Divide, extending from Georgia to the divide's northern terminus near the middle of the northern border of Pennsylvania, where it intersects the northeasterly St. Lawrence Divide, and extends further through New England.

The Royal Proclamation continues to be of legal importance to First Nations in Canada, being the first legal recognition of aboriginal title, rights and freedoms, and is recognized in the Canadian Constitution of 1982, in part as a result of direct action by indigenous peoples of Canada, known as the Constitution Express movement of 1981–1982.[4]

Background: Treaty of Paris[edit]

The Seven Years' War and its North American theater, the French and Indian War, ended with the 1763 Treaty of Paris. Under the treaty, all French colonial territory west of the Mississippi River was ceded to Spain, while all French colonial territory east of the Mississippi River and south of Rupert's Land (save Saint Pierre and Miquelon, which France kept) was ceded to Great Britain. Both Spain and Britain received some French islands in the Caribbean, while France kept Haiti and Guadeloupe.[5][6]

Provisions[edit]

New colonies[edit]

The Eastern (orange line) in the southern areas, and St. Lawrence (magenta line) watershed boundaries in the northern areas of this map more-or-less defined almost all of the Royal Proclamation's western boundaries

The Proclamation of 1763 dealt with the management of former French territories in North America that Britain acquired following its victory over France in the French and Indian War, as well as regulating colonial settlers' expansion. It established new governments for several areas: the province of Quebec, the new colonies of West Florida and East Florida,[7] and a group of Caribbean islands, Grenada, Tobago, Saint Vincent, and Dominica, collectively referred to as the British Ceded Islands.[8]

Proclamation line[edit]

New borders drawn by the Royal Proclamation of 1763

At the outset, the Royal Proclamation of 1763 defined the jurisdictional limits of the British territories of North America, limiting British colonial expansion on the continent. What remained of the Royal Province of New France east of the Great Lakes and the Ottawa River, and south of Rupert's Land, was reorganised under the name "Quebec." The territory northeast of the St. John River on the Labrador coast was reassigned to the Newfoundland Colony.[9] The lands west of Quebec and west of a line running along the crest of the Allegheny Mountains became (British) Indian Territory, barred to settlement from colonies east of the line.[10]

The proclamation line was not intended to be a permanent boundary between the colonists and Native American lands, but rather a temporary boundary that could be extended further west in an orderly, lawful manner.[11][12] It was also not designed as an uncrossable boundary; people could cross the line, but not settle past it.[13] Its contour was defined by the headwaters that formed the watershed along the Appalachians. All land with rivers that flowed into the Atlantic was designated for the colonial entities, while all the land with rivers that flowed into the Mississippi was reserved for the Native American populations. The proclamation outlawed the private purchase of Native American land, which had often created problems in the past. Instead, all future land purchases were to be made by Crown officials "at some public Meeting or Assembly of the said Indians". British colonials were forbidden to settle on native lands, and colonial officials were forbidden to grant ground or lands without royal approval. Organized land companies asked for land grants, but were denied by King George III.[14]

The Boundary Line Map of 1768 moved the boundary west

British colonists and land speculators objected to the proclamation boundary since the British government had already assigned land grants to them. Including the wealthy owners of the Ohio company who protested the line to the governor of Virginia, as they had plans for settling the land to grow business.[15] Many settlements already existed beyond the proclamation line,[16] some of which had been temporarily evacuated during Pontiac's War, and there were many already granted land claims yet to be settled. For example, George Washington and his Virginia soldiers had been granted lands past the boundary. Prominent American colonials joined with the land speculators in Britain to lobby the government to move the line further west.[17]

The colonists' demands were met and the boundary line was adjusted in a series of treaties with the Native Americans. The first two of these treaties were completed in 1768; the Treaty of Fort Stanwix adjusted the border with the Iroquois Confederacy in the Ohio Country and the Treaty of Hard Labour adjusted the border with the Cherokee in the Carolinas.[19][20] The Treaty of Hard Labour was followed by the Treaty of Lochaber in 1770, adjusting the border between Virginia and the Cherokee.[21] These agreements opened much of what is now Kentucky and West Virginia to British settlement.[22] The land granted by the Virginian and North Carolinian government heavily favored the land companies, seeing as they had more wealthy backers than the poorer settlers who wanted to settle west to hopefully gain a fortune.[23]

Response[edit]

Many colonists disregarded the proclamation line and settled west, which created tension between them and the Native Americans.[24] Pontiac's Rebellion (1763–1766) was a war involving Native American tribes, primarily from the Great Lakes region, the Illinois Country, and Ohio Country who were dissatisfied with British postwar policies in the Great Lakes region after the end of the Seven Years' War. They were able to take over a large number of the forts which commanded the waterways involved in trade within the region and export to Great Britain.[25] The Proclamation of 1763 had been in the works before Pontiac's Rebellion, but the outbreak of the conflict hastened the process.[16]

Indigenous peoples[edit]

The Royal Proclamation continued to govern the cession of Indigenous land in British North America, especially Upper Canada and Rupert's Land. Upper Canada created a platform for treaty making based on the Royal Proclamation. After loyalists moved into land after Britain's defeat in the American Revolution, the first impetus was created out of necessity.[26]

According to historian Colin Calloway, "scholars disagree on whether the proclamation recognized or undermined tribal sovereignty".

Some see the Royal Proclamation of 1763 as a "fundamental document" for First Nations land claims and self-government. It is "the first legal recognition by the British Crown of Aboriginal rights"[29] and imposes a fiduciary duty of care on the Crown. The intent and promises made to the native in the Proclamation have been argued to be of a temporary nature, only meant to appease the Native peoples who were becoming increasingly resentful of "settler encroachments on their lands" and were capable of becoming a serious threat to British colonial settlement.[31] Advice given by a Sir William Johnson, superintendent of Indian Affairs in North America, to the Board of Trade on August 30, 1764, expressed that:

The Indians all know we cannot be a Match for them in the midst of an extensive woody Country ... from whence I infer that if we are determined to possess Our Posts, Trade & ca securely, it cannot be done for a Century by any other means than that of purchasing the favour of the numerous Indian inhabitants.[33]

Anishinaabe jurist John Borrows has written that "the Proclamation illustrates the British government's attempt to exercise sovereignty over First Nations while simultaneously trying to convince First Nations that they would remain separate from European settlers and have their jurisdiction preserved." Borrows further writes that the Royal Proclamation along with the subsequent Treaty of Niagara, provide for an argument that "discredits the claims of the Crown to exercise sovereignty over First Nations" and affirms Aboriginal "powers of self-determination in, among other things, allocating lands".

Johnson v Mcintosh[edit]

The functional content of the proclamation was reintroduced into American law via Johnson v. Mcintosh [1823].

250th anniversary celebrations[edit]

In October 2013, the 250th anniversary of the Royal Proclamation was celebrated in Ottawa with a meeting of Indigenous leaders and Governor-General David Johnston.[37] The Aboriginal movement Idle No More held birthday parties for this monumental document at various locations across Canada.[38]

United States[edit]

USA Proclamation of 1763 Silver Medal: Franklin Mint Issue 1970

The influence of the Royal Proclamation of 1763 on the coming of the American Revolution has been variously interpreted. Many historians argue that the proclamation ceased to be a major source of tension after 1768 since the aforementioned later treaties opened up extensive lands for settlement. Others have argued that colonial resentment of the proclamation contributed to the growing divide between the colonies and the mother country. Some historians argue that even though the boundary was pushed west in subsequent treaties, the British government refused to permit new colonial settlements for fear of instigating a war with Native Americans, which angered colonial land speculators.[39] Others argue that the Royal Proclamation imposed a fiduciary duty of care on the Crown.[40]

George Washington was given 20,000 acres (81 km2) of wild land in the Ohio region for his services in the French and Indian War. In 1770, Washington took the lead in securing the rights of him and his old soldiers in the French War, advancing money to pay expenses on behalf of the common cause and using his influence in the proper quarters. In August 1770, it was decided that Washington should personally make a trip to the western region, where he located and surveyed tracts for himself and military comrades. After some dispute, he was eventually granted letters patent for tracts of land there. The lands involved were open to Virginians under terms of the Treaty of Lochaber of 1770, except for the lands located two miles (3.2 km) south of Fort Pitt, now known as Pittsburgh.[41]

In the United States, the Royal Proclamation of 1763 ended with the American Revolutionary War because Great Britain ceded the land in question to the United States in the Treaty of Paris (1783). Afterward, the U.S. government also faced difficulties in preventing frontier violence and eventually adopted policies similar to those of the Royal Proclamation. The first in a series of Indian Intercourse Acts was passed in 1790, prohibiting unregulated trade and travel in Native American lands. In 1823, the U.S. Supreme Court case Johnson v. M'Intosh established that only the U.S. government, and not private individuals, could purchase land from Native Americans.[42]

What were the results of the Proclamation of 1763?

What is the importance of Proclamation of 1763?

Which of the following was a result of the Proclamation of 1763 quizlet?

What important action was a result of the Royal Proclamation of 1763?