Limits to Growth Show
A female cottontail rabbit (Sylvilagus floridanus) can give birth as often as seven times a year. A female American toad (Anaxyrus americanus) can lay thousands of eggs every spring. So why are the meadows and forests of the eastern United States not literally hopping with rabbits and toads? In nature, the size of a population and the rate of population growth are influenced by what ecologists call “limiting factors.” Take It to the Limit Think about all the different resources that two common animals need to stay alive. Cottontail rabbits need food to eat (grasses and other plants), water to drink, and a safe place to raise their young. American toads eat insects and, though they often live in forest habitat, need ponds or puddles to lay their eggs. Both toads and rabbits have to watch out for predators. But even if they avoid a hungry hawk or snake, they face other potentially deadly dangers, including diseases, forest fires, or drought. Any of these factors—food, shelter, breeding sites, predators, and more—may serve to limit the growth of a rabbit or toad population. Often, the population is affected by several limiting factors that act together. Density Matters—Unless It Does Not Limiting factors fall into two broad categories: density-dependent factors and density-independent factors. These names mean just what they say: Density-independent factors have an impact on the population, whether the population is large or small, growing or shrinking. For example, a wildfire that sweeps through a dense forest in the Everglades has a big impact on every population in the community, regardless of the density of any one population. Wildfire is abiotic (nonliving), and most density-independent limiting factors fall in this category. Other density-independent factors include hurricanes, pollutants, and seasonal climate extremes. Density-dependent limiting factors tend to be biotic—having to do with living organisms. Competition and predation are two important examples of density-dependent factors. Mountain chickadees (Parus gambeli) compete for a special kind of nest site—tree holes. These little cavities are excavated and then abandoned by woodpeckers. Scientists who added new nest sites in one expanse of forest saw the chickadee nesting population increase significantly, suggesting that nest sites are a density-dependent limiting factor. A small furry rodent found in eastern Greenland called the collared lemming (Dicrostonyx groenlandicus) is a good example of how predation can be a density-dependent limiting factor. The population goes through a boom-and-bust cycle every four years. The lemming population grows to as much as 1,000 times its initial size, then crashes. The cause is stoats (Mustela erminea), a type of weasel that hunts and eats lemmings almost exclusively. Stoats do not reproduce as fast as lemmings, so after a crash, when both stoat and lemming numbers are low, stoats do not have much impact on the lemming population. But by the fourth year, after the stoat population has had time to grow to greater numbers, the stoats—together with other predators—cause another lemming crash, and the cycle continues. Carrying Capacity If a population is small and resources are plentiful, a population may grow quickly. But over time, because of limiting factors, population growth tends to slow and then stop. The population has reached the “carrying capacity” of the ecosystem. Adam E, Kaufman RH, Adler-Storthz K, et al. Castellsagué X, Díaz M, Vaccarella S, de Sanjosé S, Muñoz N, Herrero R, et al. Intrauterine device use, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Use of 9-Valent Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccine: Updated HPV Vaccination Recommendations of the Advisory Chih HJ, Lee AH, Colville L, Binns CW, Xu D. A review of dietary prevention of human papillomavirus-related infection of
the cervix and Cohen PA, Jhingran A, Oaknin A, Denny L. Cervical cancer. Lancet. Cortessis VK, Barrett M, Brown Wade N, Enebish T, Perrigo JL, Tobin J, et al. Eifel P, Klopp AH, Berek JS, and Konstantinopoulos A. Chapter 74: Cancer of the Cervix, Vagina, and Vulva. In: DeVita VT, Lawrence TS, Rosenberg SA, eds. DeVita, Hellman, and Rosenberg’s Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology. 11th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2019. Fonseca-Moutinho JA. Smoking and cervical cancer. ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2011;2011:847684. doi:10.5402/2011/847684. Frumovitz M. Invasive cervical cancer: Epidemiology, risk factors, clinical manifestations,
and Ghosh C, Baker JA, Moysich KB, et al. Dietary intakes of selected nutrients and food groups and risk of cervical cancer. Nutr Cancer. 2008;60:331-341. Hatch EE, Herbst AL, Hoover RN, et al. Incidence of squamous neoplasia of the cervix and vagina in women
exposed Hernandez BY, Wilkens LR, Zhu X, et al. Transmission of human papillomavirus in heterosexual couples. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14(6):888−894. Hogewoning CJ, Bleeker MC, van den Brule AJ, et al. Condom use promotes regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and clearance of human papillomavirus: A randomized clinical trial. Int J Cancer. 2003;107(5):811−816. Hoover RN, Hyer M, Pfeiffer RM, et al. Adverse health outcomes in women exposed in utero to diethylstilbestrol. N Engl J Med. 2011. International Collaboration of Epidemiological Studies of Cervical Cancer. Appleby P, Beral V, Berrington de González International Collaboration of Epidemiological Studies of Cervical Cancer. Comparison of risk factors for invasive squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the cervix: collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 8,097 women with squamous cell carcinoma and 1,374 women with adenocarcinoma from 12 epidemiological studies. Int J Cancer. 2007 Feb 15;120(4):885-91. Jhungran A, Russell AH, Seiden MV, Duska LR,
Goodman A, Lee S,et al. Chapter 84: Cancers of the Cervix, Vulva, and Vagina. In: Niederhuber Lu B, Wu Y, Nielson CM, et al. Factors associated with acquisition and clearance of human papillomavirus infection in a cohort of US men: a prospective study. J Infect Dis. 2009;199(3):362−371. National Cancer Institute. Physician Data Query (PDQ). Cervical Cancer Treatment – Health Professional Version. 2019. https://www.cancer.gov/types/cervical/hp/cervical-treatment-pdq. Updated February 6, 2019. Accessed on September 5, 2019. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Cervical Cancer. Roura E, Castellsagué, X, Pawlita M, et al. Smoking as a major risk factor for cervical cancer and pre-cancer: Results from the EPIC cohort. Int J Cancer. 2014; 135: 453–66. Schiffman M, Castle PE, Jeronimo J, et al. Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. Lancet. 2007;370(9590):890−907. Silva J, Cerqueira F, Medeiros R. Chlamydia trachomatis infection: implications for HPV status and cervical cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Apr;289(4):715-23. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-3122-3. Tokudome S, Suzuki S, Ichikawa H, et al. Cancer risk in women prenatally exposed to diethylstilbestrol. Int J Cancer. 2007;121:356-360. Winer RL, Hughes JP, Feng Q, et al. Condom use and the risk of genital human papillomavirus infection in young women. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2645−2654. Winer RL, Lee SK, Hughes JP, et al. Genital human papillomavirus infection: incidence and risk factors in a cohort of female university students. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157(3):218-226. Erratum in: Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157(9):858. Zhu H, Shen Z, Luo H, Zhang W, Zhu X. Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection-Associated Risk of Cervical Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(13):e3077. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000003077 Which of the following are examples of situational factors?Situational factors. Abuse and neglect. Abuse and neglect can have an impact on an individual's wellbeing. ... . Adoption. ... . Bereavement. ... . Bullying. ... . Children with looked after status. ... . Family difficulties. ... . Parenting difficulties. ... . Sexuality.. Which of the following best describes situation in person factors?Behavior is a function of interdependent person and situation factors. Which of the following best describes situation and person factors? They are dynamic.
Which of the following are the three levels that OB distinguishes among?There are three key levels of analysis in OB. They are examining the individual, the group, and the organization.
Which question is most important to ask during Step 2 of the three step approach to problem solving multiple choice questions?Which question is most important to ask during Step 2 of the 3-Step Approach to problem solving? Why or how does this cause a problem? is when our desired outcomes do not match the actual situation.
|
